Decision intelligence

The market read your committee needs, on the date you set.

Each figure in a deliverable is accompanied by its source, the as-of date of that source, and a confidence classification.

The classifications are defined in the conventions page of every report.

A$14,000to A$45,000

Six deliverables, one fixed price each, and a standing engagement at A$12,000 a month. The price quoted is the price invoiced.

8to 20 business days

Delivery, counted from countersignature of the scope schedule.

Nilto start

A brief assessment carries no charge, and neither does the written answer where a brief is declined.

2business days

Time from a brief arriving to the written assessment of it.

Source: inashanu price schedule, effective 21 September 2026.

Nil charge and two business days: terms of engagement, acceptance of briefs. As at 20 September 2026.

Australian data centre operating IT load, base case, megawatts

6 annual observations of Australian data centre operating IT load, all on one basis, rising from 1,350 megawatts in 2025 to 6,000 megawatts in 2030, with a 2030 low case of 5,000 megawatts. 1,350 megawatts at 2025 is classified reported, source ITK Research, Can data centres lower electricity costs? US and Australian industry positions on flexibility, demand response and behind-the-meter batteries, as at 11 May 2026. 1,819 megawatts at 2026 is classified an inashanu estimate, source inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model, Market_Sizing, cell F14, base case row, as at 21 September 2026. 2,452 megawatts at 2027 is classified an inashanu estimate, source inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model, Market_Sizing, cell G14, base case row, as at 21 September 2026. 3,304 megawatts at 2028 is classified an inashanu estimate, source inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model, Market_Sizing, cell H14, base case row, as at 21 September 2026. 4,452 megawatts at 2029 is classified an inashanu estimate, source inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model, Market_Sizing, cell I14, base case row, as at 21 September 2026. 6,000 megawatts at 2030 is classified an inashanu estimate, source inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model, Market_Sizing, cell J14, base case, on the 2030 target in Assumptions cell E9, as at 21 September 2026. 5,000 megawatts at 2030 is classified an inashanu estimate, source inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model, Market_Sizing, cell J13, low case, on the 2030 target in Assumptions cell E8, as at 21 September 2026. Held off the axis and not plotted: 3,530 megawatts at 2025 and 7,180 megawatts at 2030, classified flagged, on IT load capacity or installed capacity, megawatts, source Mordor Intelligence, Australia Data Center Market, as at 14 January 2026. The publisher counts IT load capacity or installed capacity, which includes racks installed and not yet drawing load; the axis counts operating IT load.

20251,35020261,81920272,45220283,30420294,45220306,0002030 low5,000
Held off the axis

Mordor Intelligence publishes a capacity series for the same market on a different measure: "In terms of IT load capacity, the market is expected to grow from 3.53 thousand megawatt in 2025 to 7.18 thousand megawatt by 2030, at a CAGR of 15.25% during the forecast period (2025-2030)."

That publisher defines the measure in one sentence: "The IT load capacity or installed capacity, refers to the amount of energy consumed by servers and network equipments placed in a rack installed." Racks installed include racks that are not yet drawing load, so its 3,530 MW for 2025 and the 1,350 MW of operating load above are two quantities of different scope. The pair is held off the axis above and carried here.

Source

Source: Mordor Intelligence, Australia Data Center Market. As at 14 January 2026.

Australian data centre operating IT load, base case, megawatts. Source: inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model. As at 21 September 2026.

2025 base 1,350 MW on Operating IT load, national, megawatts. Source: ITK Research, Can data centres lower electricity costs? US and Australian industry positions on flexibility, demand response and behind-the-meter batteries. As at 11 May 2026.

Catalogue

Seven products. One price each.

Prices exclude GST and are fixed at countersignature of the scope schedule. Delivery is stated in business days from countersignature. Named options carry published increments, which are set out in the scope schedule before work starts.

Source: inashanu price schedule, effective 21 September 2026.

Held off the scale

Standing engagement, catalogue item 07, is A$12,000 a month on a twelve-month term. A monthly retainer and a fee for one deliverable are different quantities, so it is named here and the scale above carries the one-off fees.

Its price and its term are set out at catalogue item 07 below.

Catalogue item 01. Market map

The structure of a defined sector, sized bottom up. Ships with a live workbook and the source log.

A$14,00010 business days

Catalogue item 02. Competitive teardown

Three named entities, reconstructed from their own published artifacts. Ships with an entity-level evidence file.Additional named entities are A$4,500 each, quoted in the scope schedule before work starts.

A$19,00012 business days

Catalogue item 03. Pre-IC screening memo

The question, the evidence, the three assumptions that carry the outcome, and the condition under which the conclusion would be wrong.

A$24,00012 business days

Catalogue item 04. Industry primer

A structured dataset, a bottom-up model and an interactive explorer for a defined market.

A$32,00020 business days

Catalogue item 05. Independent read

A conclusion reached without sight of yours, fixed and time-stamped before yours is disclosed, followed by a concurrence and divergence matrix.

A$45,00015 business days

Catalogue item 06. Assumption stress test

Your model, audited for the assumptions that drive the outcome and for the market share, penetration or price realisation the base case requires.

A$16,0008 business days

Catalogue item 07. Standing engagement

One named market, maintained. A monthly change report, up to three written questions answered within two business days, and the dataset refreshed each month.Twelve-month term, three months' notice.

A$12,000 per monthMonthly

The price quoted is the price invoiced. Scope, price and delivery date do not change without a countersigned variation.

Describe the decision and the date it has to be made.

The written reply names the product that answers the question, the price, and the delivery date. Where the evidence base will not carry findings at our standard, it says so and names what is missing. There is no charge for either reply.

Evidence standard

The same asset, valued at 21 times and at 87 times.

Multiple on the AirTrunk transaction as reported by the valuer, against about 87 times expected calendar-2024 earnings reported elsewhere on the same asset. The valuer bounds its own figure to the whole business.

As reported by the valuer

21x

Multiple of contracted EBITDA on the reported transaction value, for the entire business operations.

Source: PwC Australia, Data centre valuation: The billion-dollar question. As at 10 March 2026.

Reported elsewhere, about

87x

Multiple of expected calendar-2024 EBITDA, on the same asset.

Reuters Breakingviews, as at 5 September 2024, reporting the Australian Financial Review.

“This sale was reported to be a 21x contracted EBITDA multiple. We note that this applies to the entire business operations.”

The two figures count different earnings over different periods. Each is carried on this page with the basis its publisher stated, and the classification records that the pair has been reconciled to that extent and no further.

Flagged

Carried in the inashanu Australian data centre primer, transaction table.

Every figure on this page carries a source and a date.

A quantitative statement without a citation and a date is not usable by an investment committee.

The figures here are drawn from the sample primer and from the public registers behind it. Each is rendered with its publisher and the date to which it is current, and the panel records each one as you pass it.

Where a figure is an estimate produced by us, it is identified as an estimate and the basis is stated.

1,350 MW

Australian operating data centre IT load at end 2025.

Basis: Operating IT load, national, megawatts.

“Australia's operating IT load is ~1.35 GW at end-2025 versus ~50 GW in the United States.”

Source: ITK Research, Can data centres lower electricity costs? US and Australian industry positions on flexibility, demand response and behind-the-meter batteries. As at 11 May 2026. Carried in the inashanu Australian data centre primer at Assumptions cell E7.

34.8 per cent a year

The compound rate the base case requires between the 2025 reported base and the 2030 capacity anchor.

Basis: Compound annual growth of operating IT load, 2025 to 2030.

Source: inashanu Australian data centre primer, market sizing model, Market_Sizing, cell B7, base case implied CAGR. As at 21 September 2026.

Sample

One finished deliverable, published whole.

Four files go out together, and the set is what a client receives: the primer, the editable deck behind it, the model with its formulas live, and the explorer the figures were checked in.

The source log and the data-gap register are sections of the primer and sheets of the workbook, so a figure can be followed from the page it is quoted on to the cell that produces it. Read it before the conversation.

85 pages. 121 logged sources. 15 recorded data gaps. Bottom-up capacity model over 24 named facilities. Evidence current to 22 September 2026.

Source: the published primer and its companion workbook. As at 22 September 2026.

Prepared to demonstrate the standard applied to client work. No client information appears in it.

Read it without downloading anything

The whole primer is also published as 30 pages on the web, indexed by the question each one answers, with the publisher and the as-of date beside every figure rather than in a footnote at the bottom.

Four of those pages take a question the published sources answer two different ways. Each carries both numbers and states what each one measures. They are the shortest way to see the standard this studio works to.

Source

The inashanu Australian data centre research corpus and the primer it is generated from, 121 logged sources. As at 21 September 2026.

Terms

What is agreed before work begins.

Every answer below is the operative wording of a clause in the terms of engagement, and each one links to the clause it is taken from.

What it costs
Six deliverables, one fixed price each, A$14,000 to A$45,000 excluding GST, and a standing engagement at A$12,000 a month. The price is fixed at countersignature of the scope schedule, and the price quoted is the price invoiced.
Scope clause, on the terms page
How long it takes
8 to 20 business days from countersignature, stated against each product in the catalogue. The standing engagement runs monthly for a twelve-month term.
Scope clause, on the terms page
What arrives
The report, the structured dataset behind it and the working model with its formulas live, together with the source log and the register of questions the evidence did not answer. The files remain with the client after delivery.
Delivered files clause, on the terms page
What is included in the fee
One round of revisions, as defined in clause 6 of the terms of engagement.
Scope clause, on the terms page
Where the evidence runs out
Each deliverable includes a register of the questions within its scope that the available evidence did not answer, with the effect of each on the findings.
Limitations clause, on the terms page
If a brief is declined
We set out in writing what the available record does and does not contain, and what would have to become available for the question to be answerable. There is no charge for that assessment.
Acceptance of briefs clause, on the terms page
If the market moves before the committee sits
Sources are reviewed within two business days of delivery and any material development to that date is reflected in the deliverable.
Currency clause, on the terms page
How a figure can be checked
Each quantitative statement carries a citation to its source and the date to which that source is current. An estimate produced by us is identified as an estimate and the basis is stated.
Sourcing clause, on the terms page
What the work is, in law
Deliverables comprise research and analysis. They do not constitute financial product advice, legal advice or a recommendation to enter into any transaction, and recipients should obtain advice from an appropriately licensed adviser.
Character of the work clause, on the terms page
What happens to a brief
Brief content is transmitted over the form and is not placed in a link, a query string or a calendar entry.
Brief content clause, on the terms page

Source: inashanu price schedule, effective 21 September 2026.

The terms are published in full before anything is quoted.

Nothing in the engagement is settled after the scope schedule is countersigned.

Request a brief assessment

State the decision and the date. The written assessment follows within two business days.

The assessment is written and there is no charge for it.

It sets out the questions the available evidence base can answer, the questions it cannot, and the price and date if the brief proceeds.

Two business days: terms of engagement, acceptance of briefs. As at 20 September 2026.

Brief content is transmitted over the form and is not placed in a link, a query string or a calendar entry.

Acceptance of briefs

Briefs are assessed before a price is issued. A brief is declined where the available evidence base will not support findings at the standard set out in our terms. This most commonly arises where the subject is a small private market with no filings, no regulator returns and no published pricing, or where the question turns on information held only by the parties to a transaction.

Where a brief is declined, we set out in writing what the available record does and does not contain, and what would have to become available for the question to be answerable. There is no charge for that assessment.

Acceptance of briefs: terms of engagement. As at 20 September 2026.